A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

• pattern @ $this

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

由專門術語系統（terminology system）所定義之代碼的參照

允許代碼系統中的替代編碼，以及翻譯到其他編碼系統。

代碼可以在列舉清單（enumerations）或代碼清單（code lists）中非常隨意地定義，直至有非常正式的定義，例如：SNOMED CT—更多資訊見HL7 v3核心原則（Core Principles ）。編碼的排序是未定義的因而 必須沒有（SHALL NOT） 被用來推斷意義。一般來說，最多只有一個編碼值（coding values）會被標記為UserSelected = true。

定義代碼中符號意義的代碼系統識別

需要明確說明符號定義的來源

URI可以是一個OID（urn:oid:...）或一個UUID（urn:uuid:...）；OID和UUID 必須(SHALL) 參照HL7 OID註冊中心；否則，URI應該來自HL7的FHIR定義的特殊URI列表，或者它應該參照一些明確建立的系统定義。

系統定義的語法之符號；符號可能是一個預先定義的代碼，也可能是代碼系統定義的語法中的表達式（如後組合配對／後組合式）。

需要參照系統中的一個特定代碼

遵循系統的規則以呈現代碼含義的表示法

需要能為不了解此系統的讀者呈現可讀的代碼含義

輸入資料的使用者所見／所選／所說的人類可讀文字表述，和（或）其代表使用者的預期含義。

專門術語中的代碼並不總是能捕捉人類使用的細微差別的正確意義，或者根本就沒有合適的代碼；這些情況下，文字表述被用來捕捉來源的全部意義。

很多時候，此文字表述與其中一個代碼的顯示名稱相同。

由專門術語系統（terminology system）所定義之代碼的參照

代碼可以在列舉清單（enumerations）或代碼清單（code lists）中非常隨意地定義，直至有非常正式的定義，例如：SNOMED CT—更多資訊見HL7 v3核心原則（Core Principles ）。編碼的排序是未定義的因而 必須沒有（SHALL NOT） 被用來推斷意義。一般來說，最多只有一個編碼值（coding values）會被標記為UserSelected = true。

定義代碼中符號意義的代碼系統識別

需要明確說明符號定義的來源

URI可以是一個OID（urn:oid:...）或一個UUID（urn:uuid:...）；OID和UUID 必須(SHALL) 參照HL7 OID註冊中心；否則，URI應該來自HL7的FHIR定義的特殊URI列表，或者它應該參照一些明確建立的系统定義。

系統定義的語法之符號；符號可能是一個預先定義的代碼，也可能是代碼系統定義的語法中的表達式（如後組合配對／後組合式）。

需要參照系統中的一個特定代碼

遵循系統的規則以呈現代碼含義的表示法

需要能為不了解此系統的讀者呈現可讀的代碼含義

由專門術語系統（terminology system）所定義之代碼的參照

代碼可以在列舉清單（enumerations）或代碼清單（code lists）中非常隨意地定義，直至有非常正式的定義，例如：SNOMED CT—更多資訊見HL7 v3核心原則（Core Principles ）。編碼的排序是未定義的因而 必須沒有（SHALL NOT） 被用來推斷意義。一般來說，最多只有一個編碼值（coding values）會被標記為UserSelected = true。

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

由專門術語系統（terminology system）所定義之代碼的參照

允許代碼系統中的替代編碼，以及翻譯到其他編碼系統。

代碼可以在列舉清單（enumerations）或代碼清單（code lists）中非常隨意地定義，直至有非常正式的定義，例如：SNOMED CT—更多資訊見HL7 v3核心原則（Core Principles ）。編碼的排序是未定義的因而 必須沒有（SHALL NOT） 被用來推斷意義。一般來說，最多只有一個編碼值（coding values）會被標記為UserSelected = true。

定義代碼中符號意義的代碼系統識別

需要明確說明符號定義的來源

URI可以是一個OID（urn:oid:...）或一個UUID（urn:uuid:...）；OID和UUID 必須(SHALL) 參照HL7 OID註冊中心；否則，URI應該來自HL7的FHIR定義的特殊URI列表，或者它應該參照一些明確建立的系统定義。

系統定義的語法之符號；符號可能是一個預先定義的代碼，也可能是代碼系統定義的語法中的表達式（如後組合配對／後組合式）。

需要參照系統中的一個特定代碼

遵循系統的規則以呈現代碼含義的表示法

需要能為不了解此系統的讀者呈現可讀的代碼含義

輸入資料的使用者所見／所選／所說的人類可讀文字表述，和（或）其代表使用者的預期含義。

專門術語中的代碼並不總是能捕捉人類使用的細微差別的正確意義，或者根本就沒有合適的代碼；這些情況下，文字表述被用來捕捉來源的全部意義。

很多時候，此文字表述與其中一個代碼的顯示名稱相同。

A record of a healthcare consumer’s choices, which permits or denies identified recipient(s) or recipient role(s) to perform one or more actions within a given policy context, for specific purposes and periods of time.

Broadly, there are 3 key areas of consent for patients: Consent around sharing information (aka Privacy Consent Directive - Authorization to Collect, Use, or Disclose information), consent for specific treatment, or kinds of treatment, and general advance care directives.

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation.

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

The base language in which the resource is written.

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.

These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.

This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Unique identifier for this copy of the Consent Statement.

This identifier identifies this copy of the consent. Where this identifier is also used elsewhere as the identifier for a consent record (e.g. a CDA consent document) then the consent details are expected to be the same.

Indicates the current state of this consent.

The Consent Directive that is pointed to might be in various lifecycle states, e.g., a revoked Consent Directive.

This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains the codes rejected and entered-in-error that mark the Consent as not currently valid.

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

• pattern @ $this

A classification of the type of consents found in the statement. This element supports indexing and retrieval of consent statements.

A classification of the type of consents found in the statement. This element supports indexing and retrieval of consent statements.

The patient/healthcare consumer to whom this consent applies.

Commonly, the patient the consent pertains to is the author, but for young and old people, it may be some other person.

When this Consent was issued / created / indexed.

This is not the time of the original consent, but the time that this statement was made or derived.

Either the Grantor, which is the entity responsible for granting the rights listed in a Consent Directive or the Grantee, which is the entity responsible for complying with the Consent Directive, including any obligations or limitations on authorizations and enforcement of prohibitions.

Commonly, the patient the consent pertains to is the consentor, but particularly for young and old people, it may be some other person - e.g. a legal guardian.

The organization that manages the consent, and the framework within which it is executed.

The source on which this consent statement is based. The source might be a scanned original paper form, or a reference to a consent that links back to such a source, a reference to a document repository (e.g. XDS) that stores the original consent document.

The source can be contained inline (Attachment), referenced directly (Consent), referenced in a consent repository (DocumentReference), or simply by an identifier (Identifier), e.g. a CDA document id.

The references to the policies that are included in this consent scope. Policies may be organizational, but are often defined jurisdictionally, or in law.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Entity or Organization having regulatory jurisdiction or accountability for enforcing policies pertaining to Consent Directives.

The references to the policies that are included in this consent scope. Policies may be organizational, but are often defined jurisdictionally, or in law.

This element is for discoverability / documentation and does not modify or qualify the policy rules.

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Might be a unique identifier of a policy set in XACML, or other rules engine.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

Whether a treatment instruction (e.g. artificial respiration yes or no) was verified with the patient, his/her family or another authorized person.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Has the instruction been verified.

Who verified the instruction (Patient, Relative or other Authorized Person).

Date verification was collected.

An exception to the base policy of this consent. An exception can be an addition or removal of access permissions.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Action to take - permit or deny - when the rule conditions are met. Not permitted in root rule, required in all nested rules.

The timeframe in this rule is valid.

Who or what is controlled by this rule. Use group to identify a set of actors by some property they share (e.g. 'admitting officers').

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

The resource that identifies the actor. To identify actors by type, use group to identify a set of actors by some property they share (e.g. 'admitting officers').

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

resource中資料項目的唯一ID（用於內部參照）。這可以是任何不含空格的字串。

擴充的資料項目

• value @ url

由專門術語系統（terminology system）所定義之代碼的參照

允許代碼系統中的替代編碼，以及翻譯到其他編碼系統。

代碼可以在列舉清單（enumerations）或代碼清單（code lists）中非常隨意地定義，直至有非常正式的定義，例如：SNOMED CT—更多資訊見HL7 v3核心原則（Core Principles ）。編碼的排序是未定義的因而 必須沒有（SHALL NOT） 被用來推斷意義。一般來說，最多只有一個編碼值（coding values）會被標記為UserSelected = true。

resource中資料項目的唯一ID（用於內部參照），這可以是任何不含空格的字串。

可用於表示不屬於此資料項目基本定義的附加資訊。為了擴充的使用安全和可管理，對擴充的定義和使用有一套嚴格的管理。儘管任何實作者都可以定義一個擴充，但作為擴充定義的一部分，有一套要求 必須（SHALL） 滿足。

無論使用或定義擴充的機構或管轄區，任何應用程式、專案或標準使用擴充都不背負任何污名（stigma）。使用擴充是允許FHIR規範為每個人保留一個核心的簡易性。

• value @ url

定義代碼中符號意義的代碼系統識別

需要明確說明符號定義的來源

URI可以是一個OID（urn:oid:...）或一個UUID（urn:uuid:...）；OID和UUID 必須(SHALL) 參照HL7 OID註冊中心；否則，URI應該來自HL7的FHIR定義的特殊URI列表，或者它應該參照一些明確建立的系统定義。

選擇此代碼時使用的代碼系統版本；請注意，一個維護良好的代碼系統不需要版本報告，因為代碼的意義在不同系統版本中是一致的；然而，不能始終保證這點，當不能保證意義一致時， 必須(SHALL) 將版本資訊也一併作交換。

如果專門術語沒有明確定義應該使用什麼字串來識別代碼系統的版本，建議使用版本正式發布的日期（用FHIR日期格式表示）作為版本日期。

系統定義的語法之符號；符號可能是一個預先定義的代碼，也可能是代碼系統定義的語法中的表達式（如後組合配對／後組合式）。

需要參照系統中的一個特定代碼

遵循系統的規則以呈現代碼含義的表示法

需要能為不了解此系統的讀者呈現可讀的代碼含義

表明此編碼是由使用者直接選擇，例如：從可用項目（代碼或顯示名稱）的清單中選擇。

已被確定為一個臨床安全準則—此確切的系統／代碼對(code pair)是被明確選擇的，而不是由系統根據一些規則或是程式語言處理判斷。

在一系列備選方案中，直接選擇的代碼是新翻譯最合適的起點；關於「直接選擇」的確切意義，存在模糊不清之處，可能需要貿易夥伴的同意，以更完整澄清此資料項目的使用及其後果。

輸入資料的使用者所見／所選／所說的人類可讀文字表述，和（或）其代表使用者的預期含義。

專門術語中的代碼並不總是能捕捉人類使用的細微差別的正確意義，或者根本就沒有合適的代碼；這些情況下，文字表述被用來捕捉來源的全部意義。

很多時候，此文字表述與其中一個代碼的顯示名稱相同。

由專門術語系統（terminology system）所定義之代碼的參照

代碼可以在列舉清單（enumerations）或代碼清單（code lists）中非常隨意地定義，直至有非常正式的定義，例如：SNOMED CT—更多資訊見HL7 v3核心原則（Core Principles ）。編碼的排序是未定義的因而 必須沒有（SHALL NOT） 被用來推斷意義。一般來說，最多只有一個編碼值（coding values）會被標記為UserSelected = true。

resource中資料項目的唯一ID（用於內部參照），這可以是任何不含空格的字串。

可用於表示不屬於此資料項目基本定義的附加資訊。為了擴充的使用安全和可管理，對擴充的定義和使用有一套嚴格的管理。儘管任何實作者都可以定義一個擴充，但作為擴充定義的一部分，有一套要求 必須（SHALL） 滿足。

無論使用或定義擴充的機構或管轄區，任何應用程式、專案或標準使用擴充都不背負任何污名（stigma）。使用擴充是允許FHIR規範為每個人保留一個核心的簡易性。

• value @ url

定義代碼中符號意義的代碼系統識別

需要明確說明符號定義的來源

URI可以是一個OID（urn:oid:...）或一個UUID（urn:uuid:...）；OID和UUID 必須(SHALL) 參照HL7 OID註冊中心；否則，URI應該來自HL7的FHIR定義的特殊URI列表，或者它應該參照一些明確建立的系统定義。

選擇此代碼時使用的代碼系統版本；請注意，一個維護良好的代碼系統不需要版本報告，因為代碼的意義在不同系統版本中是一致的；然而，不能始終保證這點，當不能保證意義一致時， 必須(SHALL) 將版本資訊也一併作交換。

如果專門術語沒有明確定義應該使用什麼字串來識別代碼系統的版本，建議使用版本正式發布的日期（用FHIR日期格式表示）作為版本日期。

系統定義的語法之符號；符號可能是一個預先定義的代碼，也可能是代碼系統定義的語法中的表達式（如後組合配對／後組合式）。

需要參照系統中的一個特定代碼

遵循系統的規則以呈現代碼含義的表示法

需要能為不了解此系統的讀者呈現可讀的代碼含義

表明此編碼是由使用者直接選擇，例如：從可用項目（代碼或顯示名稱）的清單中選擇。

已被確定為一個臨床安全準則—此確切的系統／代碼對(code pair)是被明確選擇的，而不是由系統根據一些規則或是程式語言處理判斷。

在一系列備選方案中，直接選擇的代碼是新翻譯最合適的起點；關於「直接選擇」的確切意義，存在模糊不清之處，可能需要貿易夥伴的同意，以更完整澄清此資料項目的使用及其後果。

The context of the activities a user is taking - why the user is accessing the data - that are controlled by this rule.

When the purpose of use tag is on the data, access request purpose of use shall not conflict.

由專門術語系統（terminology system）所定義之代碼的參照

代碼可以在列舉清單（enumerations）或代碼清單（code lists）中非常隨意地定義，直至有非常正式的定義，例如：SNOMED CT—更多資訊見HL7 v3核心原則（Core Principles ）。編碼的排序是未定義的因而 必須沒有（SHALL NOT） 被用來推斷意義。一般來說，最多只有一個編碼值（coding values）會被標記為UserSelected = true。

A concept that may be defined by a formal reference to a terminology or ontology or may be provided by text.

Not all terminology uses fit this general pattern. In some cases, models should not use CodeableConcept and use Coding directly and provide their own structure for managing text, codings, translations and the relationship between elements and pre- and post-coordination.

resource中資料項目的唯一ID（用於內部參照）。這可以是任何不含空格的字串。

擴充的資料項目

• value @ url

由專門術語系統（terminology system）所定義之代碼的參照

允許代碼系統中的替代編碼，以及翻譯到其他編碼系統。

代碼可以在列舉清單（enumerations）或代碼清單（code lists）中非常隨意地定義，直至有非常正式的定義，例如：SNOMED CT—更多資訊見HL7 v3核心原則（Core Principles ）。編碼的排序是未定義的因而 必須沒有（SHALL NOT） 被用來推斷意義。一般來說，最多只有一個編碼值（coding values）會被標記為UserSelected = true。

resource中資料項目的唯一ID（用於內部參照），這可以是任何不含空格的字串。

可用於表示不屬於此資料項目基本定義的附加資訊。為了擴充的使用安全和可管理，對擴充的定義和使用有一套嚴格的管理。儘管任何實作者都可以定義一個擴充，但作為擴充定義的一部分，有一套要求 必須（SHALL） 滿足。

無論使用或定義擴充的機構或管轄區，任何應用程式、專案或標準使用擴充都不背負任何污名（stigma）。使用擴充是允許FHIR規範為每個人保留一個核心的簡易性。

• value @ url

定義代碼中符號意義的代碼系統識別

需要明確說明符號定義的來源

URI可以是一個OID（urn:oid:...）或一個UUID（urn:uuid:...）；OID和UUID 必須(SHALL) 參照HL7 OID註冊中心；否則，URI應該來自HL7的FHIR定義的特殊URI列表，或者它應該參照一些明確建立的系统定義。

選擇此代碼時使用的代碼系統版本；請注意，一個維護良好的代碼系統不需要版本報告，因為代碼的意義在不同系統版本中是一致的；然而，不能始終保證這點，當不能保證意義一致時， 必須(SHALL) 將版本資訊也一併作交換。

如果專門術語沒有明確定義應該使用什麼字串來識別代碼系統的版本，建議使用版本正式發布的日期（用FHIR日期格式表示）作為版本日期。

系統定義的語法之符號；符號可能是一個預先定義的代碼，也可能是代碼系統定義的語法中的表達式（如後組合配對／後組合式）。

需要參照系統中的一個特定代碼

遵循系統的規則以呈現代碼含義的表示法

需要能為不了解此系統的讀者呈現可讀的代碼含義

表明此編碼是由使用者直接選擇，例如：從可用項目（代碼或顯示名稱）的清單中選擇。

已被確定為一個臨床安全準則—此確切的系統／代碼對(code pair)是被明確選擇的，而不是由系統根據一些規則或是程式語言處理判斷。

在一系列備選方案中，直接選擇的代碼是新翻譯最合適的起點；關於「直接選擇」的確切意義，存在模糊不清之處，可能需要貿易夥伴的同意，以更完整澄清此資料項目的使用及其後果。

輸入資料的使用者所見／所選／所說的人類可讀文字表述，和（或）其代表使用者的預期含義。

專門術語中的代碼並不總是能捕捉人類使用的細微差別的正確意義，或者根本就沒有合適的代碼；這些情況下，文字表述被用來捕捉來源的全部意義。

很多時候，此文字表述與其中一個代碼的顯示名稱相同。

Clinical or Operational Relevant period of time that bounds the data controlled by this rule.

This has a different sense to the Consent.period - that is when the consent agreement holds. This is the time period of the data that is controlled by the agreement.

The resources controlled by this rule if specific resources are referenced.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

How the resource reference is interpreted when testing consent restrictions.

A reference to a specific resource that defines which resources are covered by this consent.

Rules which provide exceptions to the base rule or subrules.